In supply chain operations, few roles are as high-pressure and fast-moving as those in a reactive purchases team. These teams step in when a needed part isn’t available in stock — often at the last minute — and the business needs to secure it quickly to meet service level agreements (SLAs) or prevent operational delays.
The first question we always had to ask was: Why wasn't this part available in the first place?
That question led us straight into one of the biggest challenges: coordination with the planning team. The issue wasn’t always that the part was completely missing — sometimes a similar part was in stock, but not the exact specification needed to meet a contractual obligation. Other times, lead time forecasting or demand fluctuations led to blind spots in stocking strategy.
As leaders of the reactive purchasing function, we had to balance three things:
While reactive purchasing is often seen as a necessary evil, it actually opens the door to strategic improvements:
It’s tempting to assume that the financial cost of a single reactive purchase is low — sometimes it is. But looking deeper, we uncovered hidden costs:
The lesson? Even a low-inventory-value item can carry a high business impact if it’s not there when needed.
Leading a reactive purchases team meant acting quickly — but also thinking strategically about how to make those situations less frequent over time. It wasn’t just about solving urgent needs, but learning from them.